PhiLAWsophy.ai

AI is rewriting the rules of
legal practice.
We analyze what that means.

PhiLAWsophy.ai is an independent publication covering how artificial intelligence intersects with legal ethics, regulation, court decisions, and the institutions that govern public life. We publish analysis for attorneys, legal academics, and policy professionals who need more than headlines.

Browse Articles About this publication
The Landscape

The legal profession's AI reckoning is here

Over 90% of practicing lawyers now use AI tools in their daily work. Courts have imposed more than $145,000 in sanctions for AI-fabricated citations in 2026 alone. The EU AI Act classifies legal AI services as high-risk, with enforcement beginning August 2026. And state legislatures have introduced over 1,500 AI-related bills — with no two states taking the same approach.

The questions are no longer theoretical. Which AI outputs can you ethically rely on? What are your disclosure obligations when AI assists in drafting a brief? How do you build a firm AI policy that satisfies both your state bar and your malpractice carrier?

PhiLAWsophy.ai exists because these questions deserve rigorous, independent analysis — not vendor marketing or breathless futurism.

Coverage Areas

Where law, technology, and policy collide

AI Ethics & Professional Responsibility

ABA Formal Opinion 512, state bar guidance, competence and confidentiality obligations, and the evolving duty of technological competence under the Model Rules.

AI Regulation & Legislation

The EU AI Act, federal AI policy frameworks, the patchwork of state AI legislation, and how regulatory fragmentation affects legal practice and compliance.

Courts & AI Governance

Judicial standing orders on AI use, sanctions for hallucinated citations, the growing adoption of AI by federal judges, and how courts are setting their own rules faster than legislatures.

AI Bias & Criminal Justice

Algorithmic risk assessment, predictive policing, the COMPAS debate, and the constitutional implications of automated decision-making in sentencing, bail, and parole.

AI & Access to Justice

How AI tools are (and aren't) closing the justice gap, the rise of AI-assisted self-representation, and the tension between innovation and the unauthorized practice of law.

Philosophy of AI & Law

The deeper questions — machine agency, algorithmic accountability, what "fairness" means when a model decides, and how legal philosophy adapts to systems that learn.

Our Audience

Written for people who shape legal outcomes

PhiLAWsophy.ai is read by practicing attorneys navigating AI adoption, legal academics researching governance frameworks, policy professionals tracking regulatory developments, and technologists building tools for the legal industry. We assume intellectual seriousness. We don't assume you agree with us.